Inter-jurisdictional Water Pollution Management
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) asked the Department of Justice (DOJ) to file a lawsuit against nine state and local governments. The lawsuit sought to stop a massive regional water treatment plant from discharging unpermitted amounts of pollutants into the Potomac River and unlawfully disposing of sludge generated by this pollution. The suit asked the court to order each government defendant to take responsibility for their share of the pollution and sludge disposal.
The Blue Plains Advanced Water Treatment Plant is the largest advanced wastewater treatment plant in the world. At the time of this lawsuit, Montgomery, Fairfax, and Prince George’s County as well as the District of Columbia (D.C.) all used this treatment plant.
EPA representatives discovered that after heavy rainfall, levels of suspended solids and fecal bacteria in the Potomac River usually exceeded permitted limits. They also found that elevated flow in the river caused the treatment plant to exceed its capacity and improperly discharge untreated sewage effluent (liquid waste) into the Potomac.
As the plant owner/operator, the D.C. government periodically increased the levels of biologic and chemical treatment to counteract the increased pollutant loads. This also kept the plant within the effluent limits of its permit. However, this process often led to increased sewerage sludge production. This was problematic both because the region lacked adequate sludge disposal facilities and because it violated the Clean Water Act. Additionally, if the plant failed to add these chemicals and biological treatment, it would violate its discharge permit.
Based on these discoveries, the DOJ filed a lawsuit on behalf of the EPA against these state, regional and local jurisdictions. The lawsuit sought to prevent the water treatment plant from exceeding its capacity and causing point-source pollution in the Potomac River.
Richard Alper diligently worked with all parties to facilitate constructive changes and solutions. This work contributed to reaching complex solutions for managing water pollution. Following the court’s direction and a few day-long meetings, the DOJ drafted and the nine governmental bodies signed a consent decree in order to avoid an extended trial. This was a single document reflecting their collective understanding of the pollution control and sludge disposal agreement.
Helping the parties reach this settlement avoided high-profile and lengthy litigation in the nation’s capitol. Also, D.C. and both Maryland counties increased capacity and developed new methods to dispose of their respective “share” of sludge. This reduced the chance that increased treatment levels at Blue Plains would produce excess sludge and water pollution.
As part of the settlement, the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, the EPA, and D.C. all increased funding for research on advanced sewerage treatment. The research funded by these governmental bodies specifically focused on ways to minimize the production of toxic sludge and dispose of it more safely and efficiently.
“I have known Richard for a number of years and have had the opportunity to work with him on several initiatives to promote and support collaborative approaches to natural resources and environmental policy. He is passionate, thoughtful, effective, and easy to work with.”
“I have worked with Richard on several important environmental policy dialogues. He is professional, prepared and most importantly, wise. For example, we worked together on convening a policy dialogue regarding whether a community would support applying for designating a local river as a Wild and Scenic river. Richard was extremely thoughtful as we prepared questions and discussed the issue with Stakeholders. Richard is a great listener as well as being an ethical and thoughtful person.”
